Community Page
- shripriya.com/blog Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- I agree that you can't move the # of articles down. So pick carefully. I didn't break it out, but you're totally right - if you are paying anything, it would have to be universal...
- we made up the word so we can make up what it means!
- I'd note, though, that the FT model has not won them a lot of fans. They started with 30 monthly articles for free, then dropped it to 20; now it's down to 3. I think this approach can work...
- The model get the first x hits free only works as long as your competitiors can't reproduce similar content that's always free. If your site has unique value, then this goes a long way to...
- Agreed, Fred. I've never used FT, but the model I suggested in the post was exactly the same - first 10 articles are free and then the $5 monthly fee kicks in. I thought about whether this fell...
Jump to original thread »
If you are interested in photography, add the PhotoShelter blog to your feed reader and to your must-read list.
But first, let’s talk a bit about PhotoShelter1. If you are a serious amateur or a professional, this has to be a service that you get very excited about.
PhotoShe ... Continue reading »
But first, let’s talk a bit about PhotoShelter1. If you are a serious amateur or a professional, this has to be a service that you get very excited about.
PhotoShe ... Continue reading »
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
@Krishna - This competes directly with Getty. However, unlike Getty, at PhotoShelter, the photographers get to decide the prices of their photos (Getty determines it on their site). Getty is much hated in the industry since it pushes prices down a lot. While this may seem like a good thing, in the end, it is self-defeating: low prices mean that the photogs won't upload their best images and so buyers won't find the best images.